Key takeaways
Surveys say most Gen Z professionals do not want a middle-management job, but data says they are taking those jobs on the same schedule as every generation before them.
This discrepancy shows that Gen Z is willing to lead but they find the well-being cost of leadership too high.
What they ask for from leaders is specific and consistent across studies: mentorship over oversight, a sustainable workload, real decision rights, and genuine purpose they can feel in their daily work.
The succession risk exists in the design of the management job, which has been built in a way nobody would want, regardless of their generation.
Trust is built by redesigning the role so that the next generation can thrive as leaders.
Two findings about the same generation have been circulating this year, and they appear to contradict each other. In survey after survey, Gen Z professionals say they do not want the management job. In the promotion data, they are taking it at the same rate every generation before them did. Together, they describe a job that people will accept and would rather not have, and the senior leaders of today take this as an opportunity to learn about the generation that will succeed them.
What the surveys say
The headline numbers are stark. The Deloitte 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey found that only 6% of Gen Zs and millennials name a leadership position as their primary career goal. Asked what holds them back, half cite stress and burnout, half cite excessive responsibility, and 41% cite work/life balance.
The same survey finds that 44% of Gen Zs prefer steady progress over rapid promotion and that one in five would move laterally, or step back, to find the right role. Taken together, these numbers describe a generation that has looked at the first rung of the leadership ladder and decided the climb may not be worth what it costs.
The nuances behind the numbers
The placement data complicates the story. Fortune reported on Glassdoor’s analysis of who is holding management jobs, which finds that Gen Z will account for about one in ten of them in 2025, the same trajectory prior generations followed at the same age. Whatever people say in surveys, they are stepping into early leadership roles on schedule.
Deloitte’s data points in the same direction: 76% of Gen Zs say they are interested in senior leadership at some point. The desire to lead is there, but the conditions of the role are what put the trajectory at risk.
These two findings can be read as one message. This generation wants to lead and it needs the definition of leadership to change. The survey responses reflect the definition of the role as it currently exists; the promotion data describes people accepting that job because it is the only path on offer. A role that people take while telling researchers they would rather not is a role that will be held with reluctance, done at a cost to health, and abandoned at the first opportunity.
This matters for every organization that is serious about planning for its future. DDI’s Global Leadership Forecast 2025 finds that only 20% of HR leaders are confident in their bench strength, and that 40% of highly stressed leaders have considered leaving leadership to protect their well-being. The pipeline is thin at the top and shaky at the bottom. The organizations that will struggle in 2040 are the ones that keep offering a 1995 management job to a 2026+ workforce.
What they are asking for
The most useful thing about this research is how specific, and how consistent, the needs are. Across studies, four themes repeat.
Mentorship over supervision. Half of Gen Zs say a manager’s job is to teach and mentor, but only about a third say their own manager does this in practice. Instead, most report managers who focus on overseeing daily tasks. The gap between the guidance younger employees want and the oversight they receive is the largest in the data.
Decision rights. Among Gen Zs who are avoiding management, limited decision-making power is the second most cited reason after stress. A title without authority is a recipe for burnout: accountability for outcomes without control over the conditions that produce them.
Trust from the top. Trust in immediate managers has been on the decline, and now sits below trust in senior leaders. The person closest to these future leaders is the person trusted least, and they hold the job being offered to the next generation.
Genuine purpose. Roughly nine in ten Gen Zs say purpose matters to their job satisfaction, according to Deloitte. A manager role framed as throughput management will not clear that bar. One framed as developing people will.
Every item on that list is a trust condition. Gen Z is describing the behaviors that have distinguished great workplaces in every generation of the research I have worked with: a leader who develops people, gives them real authority, and connects the work to an outcome larger than themselves.
Redesigning the job for Gen Z’s expectations
If the problem is the design of the role, the response is to redesign it so it works for the next generation. Here are six tangible ways to do that:
Fix the span and the workload. Reduce administrative burden before adding people management expectations. A manager who cannot find an hour for a one-on-one cannot mentor, no matter how much the organization asks them to.
Give the role real decision rights. Ambiguity about authority is what younger professionals see as a trap. Be clear about the decisions the manager owns, the ones they influence, and the ones that are firmly outside their scope.
Train leadership as an essential skill, not a reward. Most managers have had no formal management training. A first-time manager who lacks the tools to lead will confirm every fear Gen Z has, and the cycle repeats.
Offer two ladders. Those who prefer an individual route need a senior individual-contributor track with equal status, so that management becomes a choice rather than the only way up.
Measure managers on team health. What gets rewarded is what gets done. This is the argument I made in In Defense of the Middle Manager, and it is the mechanism that makes the role worth pursuing: when the health of the team is what the organization measures, developing people becomes a goal of the role, not an ancillary consequence.
Tell the truth about the job in the offer conversation. Be forthright about what the role requires and what it trades off, so that new managers can make an informed decision about their path.
FAQs
Does this mean flattening the organization to match what Gen Z wants?
No. The same survey that shows Gen Z avoiding management shows 73% of employers calling the role crucial. The answer is a better-designed management job, and the right number of people filling it.
What single change builds the most trust with early-career employees?
Make mentorship a measured part of the manager’s job. The largest gap in the data is between the guidance younger employees want and the oversight they receive.
How does this connect to succession planning?
Every leadership pipeline starts with first-time managers. If the first rung is designed to burn people out, the pipeline empties before the board ever discusses it. The November companion piece takes up the rest of the ladder.
Closing Reflection
A generation that declines a job is giving the people who designed that job a very clear piece of feedback. The leaders who build trust with them will be the ones who listen and reimagine what the leadership role will look like for the future.
Explore More
Download the Leadership Pattern Reflection Workbook
Which of your own leadership patterns would a first-time manager on your team be learning from? The free Leadership Pattern Reflection Workbook is built to help you see them.